| 1 |
On 10/15/15 4:13 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 10:08:54 +0200 |
| 3 |
> Tobias Klausmann <klausman@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> Hi! |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> On Wed, 14 Oct 2015, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 8 |
>>> iputils is currently in @system for everyone. by default, it only |
| 9 |
>>> installs `ping`. do we feel strongly enough about this to require |
| 10 |
>>> all systems include it ? or should this wait for the long idea of |
| 11 |
>>> releasing stage4's instead of stage3's ? |
| 12 |
>> What's the gain? The package is tiny and it is one of the most |
| 13 |
>> basic network diagnostic tools. When setting up a machine, ping |
| 14 |
>> may be the only tool that lets you figure out why all the fetches |
| 15 |
>> are failing. I think we should keep it, unless there is a |
| 16 |
>> compelling reason not to (or when we get s4s). |
| 17 |
> # busybox ping 8.8.8.8 |
| 18 |
> PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8): 56 data bytes |
| 19 |
> 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: seq=0 ttl=56 time=37.303 ms |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> (bb is in @system afaik) |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
i should read an entire thread before responding :) i didn't see |
| 27 |
someone had already pointed out busybox. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. |
| 31 |
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] |
| 32 |
E-Mail : blueness@g.o |
| 33 |
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA |
| 34 |
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA |
Archives