| 1 |
On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 10:08:54 +0200 |
| 2 |
Tobias Klausmann <klausman@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Hi! |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> On Wed, 14 Oct 2015, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 7 |
> > iputils is currently in @system for everyone. by default, it only |
| 8 |
> > installs `ping`. do we feel strongly enough about this to require |
| 9 |
> > all systems include it ? or should this wait for the long idea of |
| 10 |
> > releasing stage4's instead of stage3's ? |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> What's the gain? The package is tiny and it is one of the most |
| 13 |
> basic network diagnostic tools. When setting up a machine, ping |
| 14 |
> may be the only tool that lets you figure out why all the fetches |
| 15 |
> are failing. I think we should keep it, unless there is a |
| 16 |
> compelling reason not to (or when we get s4s). |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
# busybox ping 8.8.8.8 |
| 19 |
PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8): 56 data bytes |
| 20 |
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: seq=0 ttl=56 time=37.303 ms |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
(bb is in @system afaik) |
Archives