| 1 |
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 07:15:13PM +0100, Daniel Drake wrote: |
| 2 |
> I think it logically fits better into having its own assignee. Most |
| 3 |
> resolutions suggest that no further action is needed, I don't think this is |
| 4 |
> the case here (remember we are talking about RESOLVED NEEDMAINTAINER...) |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
I guess I've already been corrupted by TEST-REQUEST, NEEDINFO, LATER and |
| 7 |
REMIND. But I guess you're right that it's kinda strange. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> As well as that, people could add themselves to the email alias if they are |
| 10 |
> interested. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Right, and it's better to have an e-mail address and get a message each |
| 13 |
time a bug is filed for a package without a maintainer, than it is to |
| 14 |
have to wade through a list of bugs you've already seen to find a few |
| 15 |
new ones. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
You've convinced me. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Maurice. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Maurice van der Pot |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Gentoo Linux Developer griffon26@g.o http://www.gentoo.org |
| 25 |
Creator of BiteMe! griffon26@××××××××.com http://www.kfk4ever.com |
Archives