| 1 |
On Sun, 2004-05-02 at 08:43, Alexander Gretencord wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Saturday 01 May 2004 16:10, Brandon Hale wrote: |
| 3 |
> > > * domenu[12_] has to be included in portage to be used by the ebuilds to |
| 4 |
> > > install a desktop entry |
| 5 |
> > Also, from further discussions with foser on the topic, I get the impression |
| 6 |
> > that the idea is to throw the current ability to edit the menu to my taste |
| 7 |
> > out the window and go for a menu generated completely by .desktop items. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> If this is really the case I'm all against the proposal. Easily generated |
| 10 |
> menus desktop icons or whatever is great for Joe Average or else he won't |
| 11 |
> find the apps but this MUST NOT (see RFC2119) make it impossible for me to |
| 12 |
> edit my menus the way I want. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Also does a Desktop Entry really mean desktop or menu or both? I like my |
| 15 |
> desktop to be clean (no icons on it at all, except those the stupid WM always |
| 16 |
> puts back and I haven't bothered to really get rid of). There will be some |
| 17 |
> use flags to control what the "desktop entry" can do, right? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
No USE flags needed. A "desktop" entry is really a .desktop entry. |
| 20 |
Most people simply drop the . due to laziness. We're talking menus |
| 21 |
only, not "desktop" icons. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Chris Gianelloni |
| 25 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux |
| 26 |
Games Team |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Is your power animal a penguin? |
Archives