| 1 |
Ühel kenal päeval, K, 01.06.2016 kell 15:18, kirjutas Dirkjan Ochtman: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> |
| 3 |
> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > Excuse me but are you really serious? We are in this swamp because |
| 5 |
> > someone tried to be too smart. And what solution do you propose? |
| 6 |
> > Let's add another layer of complexity and smartness, for a single |
| 7 |
> > variable. Obviously nothing can go wrong with this. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Please stop the derogatory remarks and unnecessary cynicism. If you |
| 10 |
> think some proposed solution is a bad idea, just explain why you |
| 11 |
> think |
| 12 |
> it's a bad idea. Not everyone has the same perspective as you on |
| 13 |
> these |
| 14 |
> things; nor are they likely to be converted to your stance by your |
| 15 |
> scolding them. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
+1 |
| 19 |
Especially given the followup mail. |
| 20 |
Really unprofessional. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
So lets have users set multiple variables for the same thing, so it's |
| 23 |
done properly because users need to care about env variable intricacies |
| 24 |
in package management deep guts. |
| 25 |
That said, maybe indeed better to force them to set it twice, as |
| 26 |
discussed in my followup mail. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Mart |
Archives