1 |
On May 23, 2005, at 11:04 am, Roy Marples wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, 2005-05-21 at 09:25 +0100, Stroller wrote: |
3 |
>> What's the difference between wpa_supplicant & wireless-tools, then? |
4 |
> |
5 |
> Both do the same job - provide the tools to configure your wireless |
6 |
> card. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> wpa_supplicant is a daemon that runs in the background and when it |
9 |
> associates with an AP in your list it applies the pre-defined security |
10 |
> settings. Any current wireless security on SOHO boxes is supported. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> wireless-tools is a set of programs that configure your card per your |
13 |
> settings and call it a day. Gentoo baselayout does some rudimentry |
14 |
> scanning and AP selection, so it's not that bad. Only WEP security is |
15 |
> supported. |
16 |
|
17 |
Thanks to both yourself & Mr Gianelloni for clarification. I'm sorry |
18 |
for the confusion. |
19 |
|
20 |
Sounds like wpa_supplicant is the more sophisticated software - I shall |
21 |
look into it. |
22 |
|
23 |
One minor point: |
24 |
|
25 |
On May 23, 2005, at 7:58 pm, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
26 |
>> Surely a user who emerges prism54-firmware will depend upon |
27 |
>> wireless-tools? |
28 |
> |
29 |
> ... They could also be setting up their card |
30 |
> as an access point or as a sniffer device. |
31 |
|
32 |
I think the access-point will need `iwconfig` (or similar if it's |
33 |
provided by wpa_supplicant) to set the SSID & (optionally) WEP key. |
34 |
That's what I use around here, anyway. |
35 |
|
36 |
I intended to cover the sniffing aspect in an earlier posting - it's a |
37 |
fairly niche usage, and I'd imagine it to be rare that a machine will |
38 |
be dedicated to sniffing for networks & never used to connect to one. |
39 |
|
40 |
But in any case, the functionality contained in wpa_supplicant covers |
41 |
my arguments, and I apologise for not being aware of it. |
42 |
|
43 |
Stroller |
44 |
|
45 |
-- |
46 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |