| 1 |
El lun, 20-02-2012 a las 13:09 -0500, Michael Sterrett escribió: |
| 2 |
> Maybe it's time to just punt svgalib? There are only 46 ebuilds that |
| 3 |
> use it (some, optionally). |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 6:30 AM, Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> > Hello |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > You can see current opened bugs for svgalib here: |
| 9 |
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=media-libs% |
| 10 |
> > 2Fsvgalib;list_id=812773 |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > Most of them already contain a patch that is supposed to fix each bug |
| 13 |
> > report, the problem is that svgalib doesn't build at all on amd64 and, |
| 14 |
> > then, would be interesting if anybody with a x86 system could check if |
| 15 |
> > patches fix the problems and commit them. |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> > Thanks a lot :-) |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
The problem is that users CCed on their bug reports have provided |
| 22 |
patches and fixes for them and would probably get angry if we punt them |
| 23 |
without even applying the patches to the tree (but I don't want to |
| 24 |
commit them as I cannot even test them at build time due being x86 |
| 25 |
specific). |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Also, looks like upstream is dead, but some distributions are still |
| 28 |
providing it :-/ |
Archives