Archives
Archives
| From: | Terje Kvernes <terjekv@××××××××.no> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Improving stability - checkpoints | ||
| Date: | Sat, 20 Apr 2002 05:58:36 | ||
| Message-Id: | wxx4ri6skkk.fsf@nommo.uio.no | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Improving stability - checkpoints by Bill Kenworthy |
||
| 1 | Bill Kenworthy <billk@×××××××××.au> writes: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | [ about checkpoints ] |
| 4 | |
| 5 | > Now this would be a *real* advance in taking some of the risk out of |
| 6 | > bleeding edge for all users, average and developer. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | yup, and it should be very doable. it is basically the same stuff |
| 9 | as I've worked on recently, with a slightly different name. :) |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | Terje |