Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC - new category dev-tos
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:38:59
Message-Id: 200601141335.55360.vapier@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC - new category dev-tos by Ciaran McCreesh
1 On Saturday 14 January 2006 08:47, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
2 > On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 09:32:49 +0100 sanchan <sanchan@g.o> wrote:
3 > | Hi all, I'm working on TinyOS related ebuilds (Bug #78908) and since
4 > | actually there are 20 ebuilds in my overlay may be worth proposing a
5 > | dev-tos category. It will take a few weeks in order to have all the
6 > | ebuilds updated for the new release of tinyos, have them reviewed by
7 > | peer an committed to the tree, but it's a lot easier to make a
8 > | category early rather than moving stuff.
9 >
10 > Any reason for dev- rather than sys-? I believe we're going with
11 > sys-fbsd...
12
13 yes, but fbsd is a self hosting env, tinyos is not
14
15 i wish there was a way we could convey the embedded aspect (embed-tos ?), but
16 dev-tos works for me
17 -mike
18 --
19 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC - new category dev-tos Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o>