| 1 |
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:21:43 -0500 Chris Gianelloni |
| 2 |
<wolf31o2@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
| On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 21:13 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 4 |
| > Oh, wait, you mean x86 released without meeting all the officially |
| 5 |
| > supported rules and didn't get moved into experimental, despite what |
| 6 |
| > was decided at the manager's meeting? *sigh* |
| 7 |
| |
| 8 |
| WTF are you going on about now? Do you even know what you are talking |
| 9 |
| about or are you just spreading more x86 hate *again*? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I suggest you take a look through the managers' meeting logs regarding |
| 12 |
the decided upon set of rules for an arch releasing into official rather |
| 13 |
than experimental. Then, once you've read them and understand the |
| 14 |
requirements, come back and explain why x86 ended up being exempt, |
| 15 |
despite the whole "x86 will not be exempt" thing. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Fluxbox, Sparc, Mips) |
| 19 |
Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org |
| 20 |
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm |
Archives