| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 10.01.2007 at 13:56, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 5 |
> On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 01:15 +0100, Robert Buchholz wrote: |
| 6 |
>> * Who will add the entries to base/make.defaults? Can I do this? |
| 7 |
> Not only *can* you, but you absolutely *must* do this if you're making |
| 8 |
> the changes. The profiles aren't some black box that nobody can |
| 9 |
> touch. |
| 10 |
> The only thing anyone asks is that you know the ramifications of your |
| 11 |
> actions. Asking here and getting sound advice should suffice for |
| 12 |
> determining whether something is worth doing and the proper solution. |
| 13 |
> *Not* adding these yourself means pawning work off on someone else, |
| 14 |
> and |
| 15 |
> possibly breaking (at least) your packages, and a violation of policy |
| 16 |
> (the "don't break the tree" one). |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Just wanted to make sure I don't break an unknown to me or unwritten |
| 19 |
rule here :-) |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
>> * Should the defaults and the USE_EXPAND entry be in base/ even |
| 23 |
>> though |
| 24 |
>> both programs do not are not keyworded for all arches? |
| 25 |
> Yes. After all, they *may* be keyworded on any arch. It isn't |
| 26 |
> like the |
| 27 |
> hardware/software *can't* run on those arches. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Good point. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Regards, |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Robert |
| 35 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 36 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
iD8DBQFFpR51yZx3L/ph1soRAgWXAKDh52GHFPK1ue3zO19Zato5/E9ESACggmvU |
| 39 |
mo0Od4tmTpQ6vD3N7ER0X/g= |
| 40 |
=LG0s |
| 41 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 42 |
-- |
| 43 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives