Archives
Archives
| From: | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new "qt" category | ||
| Date: | Sat, 19 Jan 2013 14:01:00 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAGfcS_mSa-T-s6coT44YCjPMihRF65FFdZsYqaSEdeZDhmwfFA@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new "qt" category by Patrick Lauer |
||
| 1 | On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > Maybe lib-qt ? dev-qt sounds confusing to me too, what's "dev" about it? |
| 3 | |
| 4 | I was thinking about that. A lib-misc, lib-x11, lib-qt, and so on |
| 5 | organization actually makes more sense to me than what we're doing |
| 6 | with libs in general right now. But, that is a bigger change. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Unless we plan to have more categories under lib-* I'm not sure it |
| 9 | makes sense to do that for qt alone. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Rich |