| 1 |
On 01/19/2013 09:39 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Maybe x11-qt, or dev-qt, or just qt, or qt-qt if we must have a hyphen |
| 4 |
>> for its own sake and we're just making senseless stuff up. qt-core |
| 5 |
>> just doesn't make sense if it applies to more than just qt-core. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> I actually love x11-qt as an option. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
That's silly, the x11 bit (qt-gui) is just one of the modules. You can |
| 10 |
have everything else installed without needing x11 at all ... |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Maybe lib-qt ? dev-qt sounds confusing to me too, what's "dev" about it? |
Archives