Archives
Archives
| From: | "Diego Elio Pettenò" <flameeyes@×××××××××.eu> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | "gentoo-dev@l.g.o" <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new "qt" category | ||
| Date: | Sat, 19 Jan 2013 13:39:55 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAHcsgXS2FWkZVkdsT7DBSzRVVVeBm68Hg27vaoBtcsvvOxhyjw@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new "qt" category by Rich Freeman |
||
| 1 | On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > Maybe x11-qt, or dev-qt, or just qt, or qt-qt if we must have a hyphen |
| 3 | > for its own sake and we're just making senseless stuff up. qt-core |
| 4 | > just doesn't make sense if it applies to more than just qt-core. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | I actually love x11-qt as an option. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new "qt" category | Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new "qt" category | Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o> |