| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
>> Maybe x11-qt, or dev-qt, or just qt, or qt-qt if we must have a |
| 6 |
>> hyphen for its own sake and we're just making senseless stuff up. |
| 7 |
>> qt-core just doesn't make sense if it applies to more than just |
| 8 |
>> qt-core. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Wasn't "qt-framework" the classic-style category name that was |
| 11 |
suggested in the original post? anything wrong with that? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 14 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
iF4EAREIAAYFAlD69VEACgkQ2ugaI38ACPBUQgD/VSQ3m1zeO0k+dotPWwD4I8RK |
| 17 |
8HoK5aWdXu0SZykvWHYA/jnx6lV9Q+qGhWWvE8WUL5UTCv/Q1sPyHuALMWQEhVja |
| 18 |
=9yz6 |
| 19 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives