| 1 |
Am Dienstag, den 17.03.2009, 09:05 +0100 schrieb Ulrich Mueller: |
| 2 |
> >>>>> On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Peter Volkov wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> > Probably this is not best implementation, but it describes idea |
| 5 |
> > well. If failures are non fatal I don't object to having src_test |
| 6 |
> > enabled by default and I'll all for this even. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> [Replying to a random message in this thread.] |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Has anyone already noted that for some packages (especially in sci-*) |
| 11 |
> tests just take ages, namely a multiple of the compile time? |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> If we are to enable tests for all users by default, we need some way |
| 14 |
> to deal with this. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Definitely. Not only sci-*, but also dev-libs/boost (for example) takes |
| 17 |
more than a day on a fast machine while I can't even fail src_test if |
| 18 |
some tests fail because the tests are sometimes really sensitive to some |
| 19 |
gcc/glibc/arch/whatever. |
Archives