| 1 |
Chris White wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Friday 01 September 2006 12:46, Jakub Moc wrote: |
| 3 |
>> WTH is debburn??? Geeez, make the folk respect GPL like everyone else, I |
| 4 |
>> don't want any debburn. Besides, we don't distribute any binaries (if we |
| 5 |
>> do on release media, we'll have to stop until JS regains a bit of mental |
| 6 |
>> sanity). |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> What are talking about? Debburn is the debian fork suggested in the original |
| 9 |
> post. The whole point of it IS to make it respect the GPL. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Wonderful. Make upstream respect it, instead of forking. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> Also if you stop |
| 14 |
> and look at the URL, it's an svn repository with the SOURCE for it. Most |
| 15 |
> people don't svn repository binaries. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
You've probably misunderstood me, I was referring to the "oh, we need to |
| 18 |
get rid of cdrtools ASAP" call, not to the link you've posted. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Best regards, |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Jakub Moc |
| 25 |
mailto:jakub@g.o |
| 26 |
GPG signature: |
| 27 |
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E |
| 28 |
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
... still no signature ;) |
Archives