| 1 |
Le Tue, 10 Jan 2017 14:09:07 -0800 |
| 2 |
Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> a écrit: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 01/10/2017 01:56 PM, Bernard Cafarelli wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Hi folks, |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > gnustep-base/gnustep-make has a USE flag (libobjc2) masked globally in |
| 8 |
> > base/package.use.mask, and unmasked on specific arches in |
| 9 |
> > arch/{amd64,x86}/package.use.mask |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > To get a stabilization (#579232) bug finally moving on, I wanted to |
| 12 |
> > leave this flag out, adding a corresponding line in |
| 13 |
> > base/package.use.stable.mask |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > But repoman replied with a batch of dependency.bad errors... |
| 16 |
> > Does package.use.mask (stable and ~arch) have a higher priority on |
| 17 |
> > package.use.stable.mask (stable only)? Bug or intended behavior? |
| 18 |
> > |
| 19 |
> > In the meantime, I will probably work around this by duplicating the |
| 20 |
> > package.use.stable.mask entry in arches files |
| 21 |
> > |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> If I understand you correctly, then it's the intended behavior. If the |
| 24 |
> flag is masked in both package.use.mask and package.use.stable.mask, |
| 25 |
> then the package.use.stable.mask setting is irrelevant because both |
| 26 |
> package.use.mask and package.use.stable.mask are considered when |
| 27 |
> calculating use.mask settings for any given package. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Thanks for the confirmation! I fixed it at arch level: |
| 30 |
https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=ef57bcf1f6505b79d0cf696ba8f196df1d6f9c9c |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
Bernard Cafarelli (Voyageur) |
| 35 |
Gentoo developer |
Archives