1 |
Anthony G. Basile <blueness@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
>> Since gcc-4.7 there is a -std=c++11 option, do not use it {+yet+} |
3 |
>> since it breaks the ABI, resulting in a non-functional system. |
4 |
> |
5 |
> Yes. Eventually we'll have to clear the road for this. |
6 |
|
7 |
Isn't Diego just starting a gcc-4.9 tinderbox run? |
8 |
|
9 |
It might be worth to try with -std=gnu++11 immediately: |
10 |
Most API incompatibilities which I experienced in my projects |
11 |
were either name clashes (with symbols not existing yet in c++98) |
12 |
or other trivial things (like some "char *" returns intead of |
13 |
"const char *" returns etc.); cleanly written code is likely |
14 |
to be upward compatible without any issues. |