Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: News item regarding c++98 vs c++11
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 10:57:56
Message-Id: 5444EAF3.1090703@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: News item regarding c++98 vs c++11 by Alexander Berntsen
1 On 10/20/14 04:23, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
2 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
3 > Hash: SHA256
4 >
5 > On 20/10/14 08:36, Luca Barbato wrote:
6 >> Since gcc-4.7 there is a -std=c++11 option, do not use it since it
7 >> breaks the ABI, resulting in a non-functional system.
8 > Since gcc-4.7 there is a -std=c++11 option, do not use it {+yet+}
9 > since it breaks the ABI, resulting in a non-functional system.
10
11 Yes. Eventually we'll have to clear the road for this. However, I
12 don't think we'll ever want to support a mixed abi system.
13
14 --
15 Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
16 Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
17 E-Mail : blueness@g.o
18 GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
19 GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: News item regarding c++98 vs c++11 Martin Vaeth <martin@×××××.de>
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: News item regarding c++98 vs c++11 Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o>