| 1 |
Doug Klima schrieb: |
| 2 |
>> 2) ESVN_OFFLINE which disables svn up. |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Isn't this a bit of a hack? The point is for it to run svn up. Now |
| 5 |
> I've added support in a local refactor that I had started today that |
| 6 |
> if the working copy's revision matches the requested revision, that no |
| 7 |
> svn up is performed. Obviously the situation when you have a "live" |
| 8 |
> SVN ebuild would still result in an svn up, but then again "live" SVN |
| 9 |
> ebuilds are frowned upon and if the person is trying to emerge a |
| 10 |
> "live" SVN ebuild I would expect them to always get the latest version. |
| 11 |
What, if |
| 12 |
- the server containing the repository doesn't respond? |
| 13 |
- there is currently no connection to update but you need to remerge |
| 14 |
because of new useflags added (or similar)? |
| 15 |
In both cases with a normal merge it will die when trying to do svn up. |
| 16 |
Of course with 1) you could hack around |
| 17 |
that and specify the last revision in the repository, which btw. did a |
| 18 |
svn up, too, but this was changed today. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Regards, |
| 21 |
Bernd |
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives