| 1 |
Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 2 |
> This has been an issue for quite some time. Of course, the impact is |
| 3 |
> debatable, but it seems that we cannot agree ourselves on what is |
| 4 |
> agreeable, so I see this as a point to bring to the Council simply so it |
| 5 |
> can be resolved "once and for all" and things can resume normal |
| 6 |
> operation. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
This thread so far spawned lots of reply from an external contributor |
| 9 |
making the point of keeping stale ebuilds around and 4 developers |
| 10 |
against the idea proposing different solutions ranging from force update |
| 11 |
pending some remote testing to remove the stable keyword for such arches. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Anything other suggestions? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
lu |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
PS: has anybody checked how viable is now qemu-system ? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Luca Barbato |
| 22 |
Gentoo Council Member |
| 23 |
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC |
| 24 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives