| 1 |
On pon, 2017-05-22 at 11:52 +1000, Sam Jorna wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 18/05/17 02:38, Patrick Lauer wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Since proxy-maint refuses to be removed from packages (especially since they |
| 4 |
> > were unconditionally added to all packages with a non-gentoo-dev maintainer in |
| 5 |
> > metadata) they are the de facto maintainers, and overrule everything else. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Just to clarify, the Proxy Maintainers project is not required to be |
| 8 |
> added to all packages maintained by non-Gentoo maintainers. If a Gentoo |
| 9 |
> developer is willing to work with and proxy commits for maintainer(s) |
| 10 |
> without commit access, Proxy Maintainers are happy to be removed. There |
| 11 |
> are several metadata.xml's in the tree with examples, including a few |
| 12 |
> for which you are one of the maintainers. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Just to clarify, this works only if the developer and proxied maintainer |
| 16 |
agree on the terms. It's not 'I remove proxy-maint, and now force you to |
| 17 |
work on my terms that do not fit you because reasons'. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Best regards, |
| 21 |
Michał Górny |
Archives