Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Sam Jorna <wraeth@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Fixing elasticsearch maintainer
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 05:50:03
Message-Id: 20170522055002.GA21602@cerberus.civica.com.au
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Fixing elasticsearch maintainer by "Michał Górny"
1 On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 07:47:19AM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
2 > On pon, 2017-05-22 at 11:52 +1000, Sam Jorna wrote:
3 > > On 18/05/17 02:38, Patrick Lauer wrote:
4 > > > Since proxy-maint refuses to be removed from packages (especially since they
5 > > > were unconditionally added to all packages with a non-gentoo-dev maintainer in
6 > > > metadata) they are the de facto maintainers, and overrule everything else.
7 > >
8 > > Just to clarify, the Proxy Maintainers project is not required to be
9 > > added to all packages maintained by non-Gentoo maintainers. If a Gentoo
10 > > developer is willing to work with and proxy commits for maintainer(s)
11 > > without commit access, Proxy Maintainers are happy to be removed. There
12 > > are several metadata.xml's in the tree with examples, including a few
13 > > for which you are one of the maintainers.
14 > >
15 >
16 > Just to clarify, this works only if the developer and proxied maintainer
17 > agree on the terms. It's not 'I remove proxy-maint, and now force you to
18 > work on my terms that do not fit you because reasons'.
19
20 That's why I used the phrase "work with".
21
22 --
23 Sam Jorna (wraeth)
24 GnuPG Key: D6180C26

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature