1 |
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 07:47:19AM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: |
2 |
> On pon, 2017-05-22 at 11:52 +1000, Sam Jorna wrote: |
3 |
> > On 18/05/17 02:38, Patrick Lauer wrote: |
4 |
> > > Since proxy-maint refuses to be removed from packages (especially since they |
5 |
> > > were unconditionally added to all packages with a non-gentoo-dev maintainer in |
6 |
> > > metadata) they are the de facto maintainers, and overrule everything else. |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > Just to clarify, the Proxy Maintainers project is not required to be |
9 |
> > added to all packages maintained by non-Gentoo maintainers. If a Gentoo |
10 |
> > developer is willing to work with and proxy commits for maintainer(s) |
11 |
> > without commit access, Proxy Maintainers are happy to be removed. There |
12 |
> > are several metadata.xml's in the tree with examples, including a few |
13 |
> > for which you are one of the maintainers. |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Just to clarify, this works only if the developer and proxied maintainer |
17 |
> agree on the terms. It's not 'I remove proxy-maint, and now force you to |
18 |
> work on my terms that do not fit you because reasons'. |
19 |
|
20 |
That's why I used the phrase "work with". |
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
Sam Jorna (wraeth) |
24 |
GnuPG Key: D6180C26 |