1 |
Roy Bamford posted on Thu, 20 Jun 2013 09:21:07 +0100 as excerpted: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On 06/19/13 18:35:49, Markos Chandras wrote: |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>> It is unfortunate to observe constant bullying, insults and trolling |
6 |
>> across our public media. Developers have been warned over and over that |
7 |
>> such behaviour is not acceptable and they should try to behave |
8 |
>> properly. However, people have ignored such warnings for a very long |
9 |
>> time. This ends today. |
10 |
>> |
11 |
> This has my support. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> I would like to see council voice their complete support publically too, |
14 |
> as thats one of the reasons proctors failed. |
15 |
|
16 |
++ |
17 |
|
18 |
Also, I know there's sensitivity in providing real-case examples and |
19 |
contrived examples might not work too well, but... |
20 |
|
21 |
If possible, it'd be useful to have (say) 2-3 good examples of triggers. |
22 |
|
23 |
[TL;DR folks stop there.] |
24 |
|
25 |
At least once an action is finalized (whatever way) by full devrel or |
26 |
council, arguably an action-triggering public statement in some media |
27 |
deserves an equally public apology (if the original offender finds it |
28 |
appropriate) or rebuttal (if such rebuttal on behalf of gentoo is |
29 |
necessary due to lack of apology) by the same media. |
30 |
|
31 |
IIRC I've been called on to issue an apology once. I don't remember the |
32 |
details, but I do remember that I hadn't intended it to sound the way it |
33 |
did and I unconditionally apologized once someone pointed out how it read |
34 |
from a perspective other than my own. |
35 |
|
36 |
I've also called for a public apology a (small) handful of times, only |
37 |
once recently, from a user-poster not a dev, here. One other user |
38 |
replied to that backing me up but indicating that he thought a few devs |
39 |
might need such a call from time to time as well, while I've not seen |
40 |
anything besides that one post that I considered "beyond the pale" far |
41 |
enough to call for an apology on in /quite/ some time now, so evidently |
42 |
he's a bit more sensitive than I am at this point. |
43 |
|
44 |
Which means either that the potentially triggering instances aren't |
45 |
happening on this list, or that my sensitivity needs reset. I'm worried |
46 |
about the latter, and an example or two (anyone who believes they might |
47 |
have been out of line care to post a link/apology?) might help me with |
48 |
that reset, or clarify that the triggers haven't been happening here, but |
49 |
in IRC or on the blogs or whatever. Either would be useful. |
50 |
|
51 |
-- |
52 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
53 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
54 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |