| 1 |
> And this is the point: Your definition of 'works' is (in my eyes) at |
| 2 |
> least sloppy. If it doesn't work for all sensible cases, it shouldn't |
| 3 |
> be labelled as 'works'. |
| 4 |
Does "dirty portage-specific hack" mean "That's my bulletproof solution for |
| 5 |
that problem"? I didn't mean that and I hope that's obvious. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> This is why we discourage bugreports w/p prior contact on IRC. |
| 8 |
And I discourage saying "doesn't work" w/o saying what is specifically not |
| 9 |
working esp. if the goal, at the first glance, is reached. It leads nowhere |
| 10 |
and is just stupid. "It's not safe, don't you ever do it plz!" would be much |
| 11 |
better if you for example don't have time to give the details. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
-- |
| 14 |
Piotr Jaroszyński |
| 15 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives