Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Ignoring/overwriting IUSE from an eclass
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 21:40:58
Message-Id: 200610302236.17576.kugelfang@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Ignoring/overwriting IUSE from an eclass by "Piotr Jaroszyński"
1 Am Montag, 30. Oktober 2006 22:19 schrieb Piotr Jaroszyński:
2 > > Whitespace. Not space.
3 > >
4 > > E_IUSE=$'foo\tX'
5 >
6 > Ok, you are right here. Sorry for saying that you don't know what you
7 > are talking about, it seems you do. But don't assume that everyone
8 > else don't. And for future you could be more specific, "Doesn't
9 > work", esp. If something do work(not the right way tho, but the goal
10 > is reached), is not enough. You wouldn't like to read such bug
11 And this is the point: Your definition of 'works' is (in my eyes) at
12 least sloppy. If it doesn't work for all sensible cases, it shouldn't
13 be labelled as 'works'.
14 > reports about paludis, would you?
15 This is why we discourage bugreports w/p prior contact on IRC.
16
17 Danny
18 --
19 Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@g.o>
20 Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
21
22 --
23 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Ignoring/overwriting IUSE from an eclass "Piotr Jaroszyński" <peper@g.o>