| 1 |
Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o> posted |
| 2 |
1154010353.3597.38.camel@×××××××××××××××××.net, excerpted below, on Thu, |
| 3 |
27 Jul 2006 10:25:52 -0400: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> Since the introduction of the x86 architecture team, we have had a |
| 6 |
> significant slowdown in the "stabilization" of packages in the tree. |
| 7 |
> However, we have also gotten numerous emails and messages from users who |
| 8 |
> have said that their systems are much more stable and are highly |
| 9 |
> appreciative of it[.] I tend to think that our quality has improved |
| 10 |
> dramatically on x86 due to this[.] I can attest that this extra testing, |
| 11 |
> as well as the increased efforts of the newly-energized QA project, have |
| 12 |
> made this release a much more smooth affair than any previous release. |
| 13 |
> I would definitely call this a success. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
=8^) I'm not on x86 but amd64, but of course amd64 pioneered the idea of |
| 16 |
AT, so we've been reaping the benefits for awhile, now. I too would |
| 17 |
consider an arch team, both arch-devs and arch-testers, a huge benefit. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 21 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 22 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives