1 |
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 3:03 PM, William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 02:44:09PM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote: |
3 |
>> On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 2:29 PM, William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
>> > I'll keep this short for now unless others here want to see the rest of |
5 |
>> > my evidence, but What it boils down to is this. As a member of the |
6 |
>> > systemd team, I have questioned the way we are doing things, multiple |
7 |
>> > times. I feel that we aren't doing things in the best interest of the |
8 |
>> > distro as a whole. However, consensus doesn't matter on that team; the |
9 |
>> > members are expected to do exactly as they are told. |
10 |
>> > |
11 |
>> |
12 |
>> I would not say that consensus doesn't matter, but rather that we have |
13 |
>> reached no consensus, and are rather in a stalemate. |
14 |
>> |
15 |
>> The team lead (mgorny) seems to strongly oppose making the proposed |
16 |
>> change. I'm not sure where the other team members stand. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Who is on the team anyway? It looks like there isn't even consensus |
19 |
> about that. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> According to the project page, it is mgorny, myself and dagger (I was |
22 |
> given the OK to add myself by mgorny). According to the #gentoo-systemd |
23 |
> channel, it is mgorny and floppym if you go by who has ops. According to |
24 |
> the bug bot on irc, it is a completely different set of people. |
25 |
> |
26 |
|
27 |
I would use the project page as the canonical team list. I will go |
28 |
ahead and add myself there. |
29 |
|
30 |
The only list you could get from willikins is the mail alias (!expn |
31 |
systemd). Anybody (including non-devs) can be listed on the alias. |