Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Calling die in a subshell | ||
| Date: | Sat, 15 Jun 2013 17:01:38 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20130615180129.72c2ca8b@googlemail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Calling die in a subshell by Mike Gilbert |
||
| 1 | On Sat, 15 Jun 2013 12:56:00 -0400 |
| 2 | Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | > If we find that all known implementations of PMS/EAPI 4 have |
| 4 | > implemented a certain behavior, making a change to that version of PMS |
| 5 | > to properly document the behavior seems reasonable. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Part of the point of EAPI stability is that it doesn't just apply to |
| 8 | current versions of package manglers. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | -- |
| 11 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Calling die in a subshell | Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> |