| 1 |
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Ciaran McCreesh |
| 2 |
<ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> On Sat, 15 Jun 2013 12:56:00 -0400 |
| 4 |
> Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
>> If we find that all known implementations of PMS/EAPI 4 have |
| 6 |
>> implemented a certain behavior, making a change to that version of PMS |
| 7 |
>> to properly document the behavior seems reasonable. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Part of the point of EAPI stability is that it doesn't just apply to |
| 10 |
> current versions of package manglers. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
So look back at the first versions which implemented EAPI 4 support, |
| 14 |
and see what the behavior was implemented at the point in time. |
Archives