Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Olivier Crete <tester@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] fix binary debug support, part elevenity billion
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:54:33
Message-Id: 1137516711.28568.3.camel@cocagne.max-t.internal
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] fix binary debug support, part elevenity billion by Richard Fish
1 On Tue, 2006-17-01 at 08:11 -0700, Richard Fish wrote:
2 > On 1/15/06, Olivier Crête <tester@g.o> wrote:
3 > > Why not use the splitdebug instead of nostrip? And make building with -g
4 > > the default, then tell small HD users how to disable it in the docs. And
5 > > it needs to disable -fomit-frame-pointer at least on x86. I've been
6 > > building my whole system with splitdebug and yes it does take a lot of
7 > > space, but its really useful.
8 >
9 > No argument against splitdebug, but my guess is that it would be
10 > useless for 99.97% of users, and would lead to complaints on -user
11 > about how much disk space gentoo consumes compared to <insert least
12 > favorite distribution here>, so it should not be the default.
13
14 The argument in favor of splitdebug is that it allows users to give
15 useful bugreports when using tools such as gnome's bug-buddy. Currently,
16 gentoo users provide very little useful information because everything
17 is stripped. And it only adds a few hundred megs and its easy to
18 disable. Probably should be explained in the handbook if we make it the
19 default.
20
21
22 --
23 Olivier Crête
24 tester@g.o
25 Gentoo Developer
26
27
28 --
29 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] fix binary debug support, part elevenity billion "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" <flameeyes@g.o>