1 |
Doug Goldstein wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Once all but the last arch has keyworded said package, it is acceptable |
4 |
> and proper for a bug wrangler and/or maintainer/herd to re-assign the |
5 |
> bug to the last remaining arch and they remove that arch from CC. They |
6 |
> should add their herd/maintainer to the CC of the bug. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Once the last remaining arch has completed the bug, it is up to them to |
9 |
> close it. They know it's up to them to close it since the bug is |
10 |
> assigned directly to them. |
11 |
|
12 |
I've always thought the reassignment was kinda silly. The last arch to |
13 |
stabilize usually knows to close the bug anyways, and if they miss it |
14 |
it's easy enough for the maintainer to finish it up. I have no strong |
15 |
convictions either way however. |
16 |
|
17 |
Bugzilla with multiple assignees would be cool. Or even just some way |
18 |
to differentiate CCed archs from CCed randompeoples. |
19 |
|
20 |
> This helps keep bugzilla tidy and makes it easy to identify |
21 |
> stabilization/keywording requests which are a priority for that arch to |
22 |
> take care of. |
23 |
|
24 |
<insert stuff leio said here> |
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
where to now? if i had to guess |
28 |
dirtyepic gentoo org i'm afraid to say antarctica's next |
29 |
9B81 6C9F E791 83BB 3AB3 5B2D E625 A073 8379 37E8 (0x837937E8) |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |