Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP: RESTRICT=interactive
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 03:04:07
Message-Id: 453050C6.8050909@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP: RESTRICT=interactive by Donnie Berkholz
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Donnie Berkholz wrote:
5 > It still doesn't make sense. Restricting any other feature disallows it.
6 > Restricting interaction allows it. Find a word that's the antonym of
7 > interactive, and restrict that.
8
9
10 Perhaps "unattended", since interactive ebuilds must be attended...
11
12 Zac
13 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
14 Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
15
16 iD8DBQFFMFC//ejvha5XGaMRAhTRAJkBlEa7USKjQPsAa9WgS8R4zzWKsACfdbvn
17 AdUyIwHgg41QDK3lS+zWSsk=
18 =Yls5
19 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
20 --
21 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP: RESTRICT=interactive paul <paul@×××××××××.org>
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP: RESTRICT=interactive Marius Mauch <genone@g.o>