| 1 |
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Agostino Sarubbo <ago@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sunday 17 February 2013 19:36:16 Markos Chandras wrote: |
| 3 |
>> First you need to tell us what arches you think they are considered |
| 4 |
>> 'minor' and/or understaffed so we can finally document that. Then, in |
| 5 |
>> my opinion, the ideal approach would be to just drop the stable |
| 6 |
>> keywords for them. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/index.xml#doc_chap4 |
| 9 |
> I don't see project page for: m68k, sh, s390 |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> 20:41 <ago> expn m68k |
| 13 |
> 20:41 <willikins> m68k = vapier, |
| 14 |
> 20:41 <ago> expn sh |
| 15 |
> 20:42 <willikins> sh = vapier,matsuu,armin76,ago, |
| 16 |
> 20:42 <ago> expn s390 |
| 17 |
> 20:42 <willikins> s390 = vapier,armin76,ago, |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Afaik sh and s390 were both vapier-driven projects. I'd recommend |
| 20 |
chatting with him as to whether they are worth salvaging. It is not |
| 21 |
clear to me why you would email the -dev list about these arches, |
| 22 |
vapier is pretty responsive over email and irc. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-A |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
> -- |
| 27 |
> Agostino Sarubbo / ago -at- gentoo.org |
| 28 |
> Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 29 |
> |
Archives