Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Agostino Sarubbo <ago@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] The status of the 'minor' arches in gentoo
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 19:43:22
Message-Id: 1876970.ovCtsDMXQe@devil
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] The status of the 'minor' arches in gentoo by Markos Chandras
1 On Sunday 17 February 2013 19:36:16 Markos Chandras wrote:
2 > First you need to tell us what arches you think they are considered
3 > 'minor' and/or understaffed so we can finally document that. Then, in
4 > my opinion, the ideal approach would be to just drop the stable
5 > keywords for them.
6
7 http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/index.xml#doc_chap4
8 I don't see project page for: m68k, sh, s390
9
10
11 20:41 <ago> expn m68k
12 20:41 <willikins> m68k = vapier,
13 20:41 <ago> expn sh
14 20:42 <willikins> sh = vapier,matsuu,armin76,ago,
15 20:42 <ago> expn s390
16 20:42 <willikins> s390 = vapier,armin76,ago,
17 --
18 Agostino Sarubbo / ago -at- gentoo.org
19 Gentoo Linux Developer

Replies