1 |
When you take a look at our current social contract |
2 |
(http://www.gentoo.org/main/en/contract.xml) you will read that it talks |
3 |
about "Gentoo Linux" exclusively. However, with Gentoo growing and non-Linux |
4 |
ports in the make, it might be wise to change the naming from "Gentoo Linux" |
5 |
to "Gentoo". |
6 |
|
7 |
The main question however is: "What is Gentoo"? When will we talk about |
8 |
"Gentoo" and when do we talk about "a project" that "the Gentoo Project" is |
9 |
working on? |
10 |
|
11 |
Based on the feedback I gathered from the managers meeting and from |
12 |
developers, I'd like to propose something along the following lines: |
13 |
|
14 |
""" |
15 |
We call a collection of software "Gentoo" when: |
16 |
- it in total is able to boot itself (self-hosting) |
17 |
- it is actively developed by the Gentoo Project |
18 |
- its main software management application is a native Portage |
19 |
|
20 |
With "actively developed" it is meant that: |
21 |
- the project has specific development/user channels (mailinglist & irc) |
22 |
- the project is listed on the Gentoo Projects page [1] |
23 |
|
24 |
[1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/index.xml?showlevel=2 |
25 |
""" |
26 |
|
27 |
Any thoughts (both on the s/Gentoo Linux/Gentoo/ and Gentoo definition? I'm |
28 |
sure there are lots of questions about the above proposal, so fire away. |
29 |
|
30 |
Wkr, |
31 |
Sven Vermeulen |
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
^__^ And Larry saw that it was Good. |
35 |
(oo) Sven Vermeulen |
36 |
(__) http://www.gentoo.org Documentation & PR |