| 1 |
Raúl Porcel wrote: |
| 2 |
> Xulrunner-1.9 is a big change, and the apps using it won't work until |
| 3 |
> they are fixed. So this needs to be decided, i've been working on |
| 4 |
> slotting xulrunner, and i'm ready to put it in the tree. However i'd |
| 5 |
> like to see what developers(since they will be the ones who will have to |
| 6 |
> deal with this) and users prefer. Even if an app is compatible with |
| 7 |
> xulrunner-1.9, it will have to be patched if we slot xulrunner. Since |
| 8 |
> the pkgconfig files for xulrunner-1.9 are renamed to avoid collisions |
| 9 |
> with current xulrunner-1.8. |
| 10 |
> The other approach would be not slotting it, p.mask xulrunner-1.9 and |
| 11 |
> wait until all the packages work against it and then unmask. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Given the number of applications I'd rather have them fixed with the |
| 14 |
patches pushed to respective upstreams if we got there first. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
lu |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Luca Barbato |
| 21 |
Gentoo Council Member |
| 22 |
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC |
| 23 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives