Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] autotools-multilib: wrapper eclass for multilib builds.
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 00:46:11
Message-Id: CAEdQ38GFrkvcRdWjPTppDoN9Wd8vBuOF05ZDEAHsak8iDEud8g@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] autotools-multilib: wrapper eclass for multilib builds. by Alexis Ballier
1 On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o> wrote:
2 > On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 00:10:21 +0200
3 > Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
4 >
5 >> On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:59:14 -0300
6 >> Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o> wrote:
7 >>
8 >> > On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 23:51:27 +0200
9 >> > Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
10 >> >
11 >> > > On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:19:43 -0300
12 >> > > Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o> wrote:
13 >> > >
14 >> > > > you dont need this, the PM has already done the work for you:
15 >> > > > call directly the relevant function.
16 >> > > >
17 >> > > > src_multilib_compile() {
18 >> > > > forall ABIS; do
19 >> > > > prepare ABI variables
20 >> > > > src_compile
21 >> > > > done
22 >> > > > }
23 >> > >
24 >> > > Err, what? Who calls the function? Where?
25 >> >
26 >> > bash. here.
27 >>
28 >> How can an eclass call a phase function while eclass needs to be
29 >> called from the phase function to call the phase function...?
30 >>
31 >
32 > Read again. Esp. the part you deleted.
33 > I never said it should do this, on purpose...
34 >
35
36 I'm especially confused by what your point is. I can't see how your
37 snippet could ever work, and you're being evasive about answering
38 that.

Replies