| 1 |
>>>>> On Sat, 15 Jun 2013, hasufell wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>> PMS doesn't guarantee that die works correctly in a subshell: |
| 4 |
>> http://dev.gentoo.org/~ulm/pms/5/pms.html#x1-12800011.3.3 |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> So the devmanual agrees with the spec, and the eclasses need to be |
| 7 |
>> fixed. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> How does that make any sense? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
It makes perfect sense. The specification doesn't require that the |
| 12 |
package manager's die function works in a subshell, so ebuilds and |
| 13 |
eclasses cannot rely on such behaviour. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
If you want a different behaviour for future EAPIs, then PMS needs to |
| 16 |
be changed. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Ulrich |
Archives