Archives
Archives
| From: | hasufell <hasufell@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Calling die in a subshell | ||
| Date: | Sat, 15 Jun 2013 16:19:48 | ||
| Message-Id: | 51BC941B.8090602@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Calling die in a subshell by Ulrich Mueller |
||
| 1 | On 06/15/2013 06:16 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > PMS doesn't guarantee that die works correctly in a subshell: |
| 4 | > http://dev.gentoo.org/~ulm/pms/5/pms.html#x1-12800011.3.3 |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > So the devmanual agrees with the spec, and the eclasses need to be |
| 7 | > fixed. |
| 8 | > |
| 9 | |
| 10 | How does that make any sense? |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Calling die in a subshell | "Diego Elio Pettenò" <flameeyes@×××××××××.eu> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Calling die in a subshell | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> |