| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 12:24:06 -0400 |
| 4 |
> Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
>> Well, from what I can gather, he only *thinks* he knows what was going |
| 6 |
>> on and he's filled in the blanks himself with whatever ideas he's come |
| 7 |
>> up with on his own. If he really does have the logs, he wouldn't be |
| 8 |
>> spouting off at the mouth since he would know that there's nothing |
| 9 |
>> damning in there, at all. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I know that you and kingtaco threatened to remove a fellow Council |
| 12 |
> member's access if he didn't go along with you on whatever it was you |
| 13 |
> were discussing. If there's nothing damning in there, why would you do |
| 14 |
> such a thing? |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
>From what I have read so far, it wasn't a question of someone being |
| 17 |
pressured to "go along with.. whatever it was <they> were discussing" but |
| 18 |
rather to keep a confidence. Mr Gianelloni is right: if other parties |
| 19 |
cannot have confidential discussions with Gentoo, it will damage the |
| 20 |
distribution. As such, it is imo incumbent upon council members to keep |
| 21 |
such matters (whatever they might be) private. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
He has already stipulated that "all decisions we made were 100% public" |
| 24 |
and "We do have to have all of our decisions made public, obviously." |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
That's transparent enough for me at least. I don't want to be privy to every |
| 27 |
discussion, and I certainly don't want to know about say aspects of other |
| 28 |
people's private lives which might affect their work, or even that company |
| 29 |
X is having confidential talks with gentoo, which might come to nothing. I |
| 30 |
just want to enjoy the software and the community, and these frankly |
| 31 |
paranoid ramblings make the dev list much less fun. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives