| 1 |
On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 12:24:06 -0400 |
| 2 |
Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> Well, from what I can gather, he only *thinks* he knows what was going |
| 4 |
> on and he's filled in the blanks himself with whatever ideas he's come |
| 5 |
> up with on his own. If he really does have the logs, he wouldn't be |
| 6 |
> spouting off at the mouth since he would know that there's nothing |
| 7 |
> damning in there, at all. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
I know that you and kingtaco threatened to remove a fellow Council |
| 10 |
member's access if he didn't go along with you on whatever it was you |
| 11 |
were discussing. If there's nothing damning in there, why would you do |
| 12 |
such a thing? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> I'm not sure I follow what you're saying here. Are you saying that |
| 15 |
> Gentoo developers would lose trust in us because we are keeping our |
| 16 |
> word to people who spoke to us in confidence? Are you referring to a |
| 17 |
> potential leak? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
There is nothing stopping you from posting a several paragraph summary |
| 20 |
of whatever it was that was being discussed. Leave gaps for |
| 21 |
confidential things as appropriate, but don't use it as an excuse for |
| 22 |
burying the whole thing as you're trying to do here. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives