1 |
Lance Albertson wrote: [Mon Jan 02 2006, 12:14:05PM CST] |
2 |
> Gentoo has been missing some kind of direction/goal for some time now. |
3 |
> Looking back at the last two years, what are the major |
4 |
> changes/accomplishments that we have done? Granted, I know there has |
5 |
> been great strides in improvement in some things, but I really wonder |
6 |
> about any ground breaking enhancements. |
7 |
|
8 |
Assuming that we can ever get GLEP 42 out the door, I think that will |
9 |
constitute ground-breaking. There has actually been a considerable |
10 |
amount of progress on the Portage front, as well, although not all of |
11 |
the new stuff is out yet. Similarly, the slowly-rolling website |
12 |
redesign is truly on the verge of being released. We also have had |
13 |
excellent modular X11 support for some time now, and it appears that |
14 |
gcc-4.x support is doing quite well, too. |
15 |
|
16 |
Oh, and we've also retired an amazing number of no-longer-active devs, |
17 |
so I don't know if it's actually true that we've added numbers. |
18 |
|
19 |
> I'm not sure of the exact solution. Its just been pretty frustrating |
20 |
> lately hearing folks complain about this and that when I know that we |
21 |
> could do so much better. Maybe we're just happy with being where we're |
22 |
> at. I know I'm not. There's a niche that Gentoo fits really well and I |
23 |
> think we should focus on perfecting that niche instead of trying to be |
24 |
> better than distroA or distroB. |
25 |
|
26 |
Okay, so you're not happy with Gentoo's direction, but what are you |
27 |
actively doing to change it? (Other than starting this discussion, that |
28 |
is?) I don't mean that question as an attack, although it may well |
29 |
appear that way. It's also not directed at you, since others have |
30 |
made similar comments. Instead, I'm suggesting that the reason that Gentoo |
31 |
lacks a leadership position right now is that, at least where Gentoo is |
32 |
concerned, effective leadership generally means an individual who is |
33 |
putting in a _lot_ of hard work writing code and implementing changes. |
34 |
That's one of the reasons that drobbins could be effective--he had the |
35 |
time to extend portage, work on the website to fit his vision, and make |
36 |
sweeping changes to the tree. In that respect, I would argue that |
37 |
Gentoo's most leader-like person right now is vapier, because he's a dev who |
38 |
actively enacts wide-ranging changes. Similarly, flameeyes, ciaranm, |
39 |
and the portage team all deserve credit for having a significant impact |
40 |
on where Gentoo has been going recently. (Yes, I also realize that |
41 |
people may not agree with some of what those devs have been |
42 |
doing, but they have been out there getting their hands dirty, and it |
43 |
makes a huge difference.) |
44 |
|
45 |
*Shrug* My feeling is that Gentoo is not advancing all that quickly |
46 |
right now, but that it's being maintained fairly well. More |
47 |
importantly, we still ensure that people _can_ make sweeping changes, if |
48 |
they want to put in the work to do so. I'm actually fairly confident |
49 |
about Gentoo having a decent future. |
50 |
|
51 |
-g2boojum- |
52 |
-- |
53 |
Grant Goodyear |
54 |
Gentoo Developer |
55 |
g2boojum@g.o |
56 |
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum |
57 |
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76 |