Archives
Archives
| From: | Jon Portnoy <avenj@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Closing bugs [was: New Bugzilla HOWTO] | ||
| Date: | Sun, 10 Jul 2005 14:21:23 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20050710141825.GA21742@cerberus.oppresses.us | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Closing bugs [was: New Bugzilla HOWTO] by "Nathan L. Adams" |
||
| 1 | On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 09:49:16AM -0400, Nathan L. Adams wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > To restate the problem: When a dev submits a fix for a bug, it should be |
| 4 | > verified and peer reviewed before the bug is marked done. |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | |
| 7 | That's not a problem, that's an opinion. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | I'm not at all convinced that not having every bug resolution reviewed |
| 10 | every time is a problem, maybe you should start there :) |
| 11 | |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | Jon Portnoy |
| 14 | avenj/irc.freenode.net |
| 15 | -- |
| 16 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Closing bugs [was: New Bugzilla HOWTO] | "Nathan L. Adams" <nadams@××××.org> |