| 1 |
Am Samstag, 24. März 2007 20:53 schrieb Luca Barbato: |
| 2 |
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Which is all very nice in theory, but completely impractical and |
| 4 |
> > useless in practice. There's far too much difference and far too |
| 5 |
> > much complexity implementation-wise to make this practical for any |
| 6 |
> > non-trivial functionality. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I'd like to have more details, please. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Trivial functionality would be already fine for most of the |
| 11 |
> front-ends IMHO. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
* Paludis supports multiple repositories, don't know about pkgcore, but |
| 14 |
i guess they support it as well. Portage doesn't. (actually it has 3 |
| 15 |
repositories, but that's not really related to multiple repository |
| 16 |
support) |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
* Paludis handles ENVVARs on a per package basis, Portage doesn't. |
| 19 |
(no idea about how pkgcore does it) |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
* Paludis repositories aren't necessarily ebuild repositories. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
This is what comes to my mind right now. The list is certainly not |
| 24 |
complete :-) |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Danny |
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@g.o> |
| 29 |
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project |
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives