| 1 |
El 11/05/11 17:43, Duncan escribió: |
| 2 |
> Markos Chandras posted on Wed, 11 May 2011 15:27:48 +0100 as excerpted: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> To my perspective, split ebuilds ease the integration of patches. You |
| 5 |
>> can patch a single ebuild and not have to rebuild everything else. But, |
| 6 |
>> when it comes to version bumps, I think it is more safe to bump |
| 7 |
>> everything. Do note that we apply patches more frequently than we do |
| 8 |
>> version bumps, so it is definitely worth the pain of having split |
| 9 |
>> ebuilds. |
| 10 |
> That was another reason given, and it still makes sense, as does the |
| 11 |
> safety of bumping everything together (no revdep-rebuild issues that way). |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Thanks for the reminder. =:^) |
| 14 |
Me be user. Me see that latest version of QT not in portage. Me open bug |
| 15 |
to ask for a bump. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Not that all our users are stupid, but most of them don't know wether |
| 18 |
things changed or not between versions. |
Archives