| 1 |
urk. Thats bad! When the kernel brk() updates were being done, I |
| 2 |
wondered why it was taking so long between notifications. You may want |
| 3 |
to reconsider this from the point that timely notification of bugs and |
| 4 |
responses is one of the advantages of bugzilla - sitting on information |
| 5 |
is a bad idea from a bugzilla user point of view. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
You dont sit on bug submissions and forwarding to those who need them as |
| 8 |
well do you? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
BillK |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
On Sat, 2003-12-06 at 23:49, Jason Wever wrote: |
| 13 |
> On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 12:43:53 -0500 |
| 14 |
> Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> > bugzilla does a queueing thing now ... |
| 17 |
> > rather then sending out an e-mail for every change like it used to, it |
| 18 |
> > tends to try to send one e-mail with a bunch of changes ... |
| 19 |
> > it's not perfect but it's *ok* imo |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Found out today that I've not been receiving emails for bug #19776 for |
| 22 |
> over a week now, including several comments and an attachment. I don't |
| 23 |
> know if this is related to queuing or not, but if someone could look into |
| 24 |
> this, it would be great. Problems like this don't make for good QA :( |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives