1 |
Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> said: |
2 |
> >>>>> On Thu, 19 May 2011, Alec Warner wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> > You should file a bug about that; I'm sure one of the portage guys |
5 |
> > can change the crap code I wrote 4 years ago to use the normal |
6 |
> > dependency checking code for installed atoms. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> But we wouldn't know if users have the updated portage version |
9 |
> installed, so it doesn't help for the current news item. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> I think for a proper solution we would have to increase the number of |
12 |
> the News-Item-Format. Maybe even add a new header field for the EAPI. |
13 |
|
14 |
This seems like the absolute easiest solution to use going forward. |
15 |
|
16 |
Having an 'eapi' file present seems workable as well, though I'm not |
17 |
certain which is the easiest for Portage to implement today. |
18 |
|
19 |
Are there any other suggestions, or does anyone disagree with Ulrich's |
20 |
suggestion? |
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
Mark Loeser |
24 |
email - halcy0n AT gentoo DOT org |
25 |
email - mark AT halcy0n DOT com |
26 |
web - http://www.halcy0n.com |