| 1 |
Am Montag, 8. Mai 2017, 12:49:32 CEST schrieb Mikle Kolyada: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Against. Do not touch things you are not working on, council has already |
| 4 |
> dropped m68k s390 and sh to exp few years ago. Now we have a big mess |
| 5 |
> there and only, while ia64 sparc and co have slow but progress and |
| 6 |
> mature enough stable profiles. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
No objections against having many arches, but: |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
If an arch is keyworded / stable on more packages than that team can |
| 11 |
reasonably take care of, that needs to be corrected somehow. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
The easiest solution is for the arch team to remove keywords until they have a |
| 14 |
reasonable response time again. And if the arch team doesn't do that by |
| 15 |
itself, well, ... |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Having one-man teams block everybody else hurts Gentoo as a whole. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Andreas K. Hüttel |
| 21 |
dilfridge@g.o |
| 22 |
Gentoo Linux developer (council, perl, libreoffice) |
Archives